Implement change with much less resistance/opposition
There would be only internal struggles for power,no external strife in the country,so more peace
People would be selected based more on meritocracy rather than charisma,so better people would be heading the nation.
Party would be able to get things done to benefit the country without having to appease the people at the same time.
Disadvantage:
If party is corrupt the country would never come out of the pit as it's leaders cannot be overthrown.
People may not be receiving proper treatment in China according to the human rights act as the government does not need the support of the common people
If the party decides to pass their positions to their children it would become like a monarchy and nobody can stop them.
I think it would not have been able to progress as they were very backwards in many aspects,without the one party system changes would not be as swift and quick to be implemented and today it would be a third world country. This is so because of its political instability at that period and people were hungry for power.The majority are uneducated people who would just support the person that appeals to them more and would not consider how he could contribute to the country not just to themselves.
I think it will still benefit china
It is similar to Singapore's system
Singapore has everything to learn from China but not the other way
No comments:
Post a Comment